<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for The Luminary Diary	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.theluminarydiary.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 11:32:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on &#8216;The Trees Have Eyes&#8217; &#8211; Indian Scops Owl by Image Break-down: Scops Owl Through A Keyhole - The Luminary Diary		</title>
		<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/the-trees-have-eyes-indian-scops-owl-bharatpur-keoladeo-national-park/#comment-32970</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Image Break-down: Scops Owl Through A Keyhole - The Luminary Diary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 11:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theluminarydiary.com/?p=14804#comment-32970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] The Indian Scops Owl is one of my favourite bird species of all time. Mysterious, elusive, and perfectly camouflaged, these pocket predators are always high up on my list of targets whenever I visit Bharatpur. During my previous encounter with this species, well, let&#8217;s just say I had an absolute blast! [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Indian Scops Owl is one of my favourite bird species of all time. Mysterious, elusive, and perfectly camouflaged, these pocket predators are always high up on my list of targets whenever I visit Bharatpur. During my previous encounter with this species, well, let&#8217;s just say I had an absolute blast! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Nikon 500mm f/4e FL &#8211; A Long-term Review and Comparison with the 500mm PF by Jeet Narayan Dutta		</title>
		<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/nikon-500mm-fl-pf-review-and-comparison/#comment-32967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeet Narayan Dutta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2024 18:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.theluminarydiary.com/?p=19645#comment-32967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, I own the Z8 + 400mm F4.5 for Tele end &#038; Z 70-200mm f2.8 at the wide end. I want to purchase a used (2.2 yrs old) 500mm F4E FL ED by exchanging my Z400mm F4.5 + around 1600 USD. I mainly photograph bigcats here in India and also the Maasai Mara &#038; Serengeti. So, I want a bit more reach &#038; a bit more background separation.

So, is it worth it to upgrade from Z400mm F4.5 to 500mm F4E FL + FTZ II for the Z8. Or, should I get the 180-600mm instead. All other options are out of budget.
Thank You]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I own the Z8 + 400mm F4.5 for Tele end &amp; Z 70-200mm f2.8 at the wide end. I want to purchase a used (2.2 yrs old) 500mm F4E FL ED by exchanging my Z400mm F4.5 + around 1600 USD. I mainly photograph bigcats here in India and also the Maasai Mara &amp; Serengeti. So, I want a bit more reach &amp; a bit more background separation.</p>
<p>So, is it worth it to upgrade from Z400mm F4.5 to 500mm F4E FL + FTZ II for the Z8. Or, should I get the 180-600mm instead. All other options are out of budget.<br />
Thank You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Nikon 500mm f/4e FL &#8211; A Long-term Review and Comparison with the 500mm PF by Aditya Sridhar		</title>
		<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/nikon-500mm-fl-pf-review-and-comparison/#comment-32966</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aditya Sridhar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2024 03:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.theluminarydiary.com/?p=19645#comment-32966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theluminarydiary.com/nikon-500mm-fl-pf-review-and-comparison/#comment-32965&quot;&gt;Tanumoy Das&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi there! Thank you for visiting! :)

I&#039;d say the 500mm PF is a sizeable upgrade from the 200-500mm in terms of IQ, but there are numerous other factors worth considering over sharpness alone. I&#039;d say the biggest advantage you&#039;d notice in the field with the 500mm PF is its light weight and quick auto-focus. It is an incredible lens for photographing birds in flight. However, the 200-500mm offers the flexibility of a zoom lens which absolutely should not be overlooked. I think any differences in sharpness is overshadowed by the other auxillary benefits these lenses provide so you can&#039;t really go wrong with either of them in reality.

At this point in time, I&#039;d also suggest looking at some of the Z-mount options on the market (if you own a mirrorless camera) such as the 400mm f/4.5 and the 600mm f/6.3 as I&#039;ve heard great things about them. The 180-600mm could be a decent upgrade from your 200-500mm as well. 

Hope this helps!
-Adi]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.theluminarydiary.com/nikon-500mm-fl-pf-review-and-comparison/#comment-32965">Tanumoy Das</a>.</p>
<p>Hi there! Thank you for visiting! 🙂</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say the 500mm PF is a sizeable upgrade from the 200-500mm in terms of IQ, but there are numerous other factors worth considering over sharpness alone. I&#8217;d say the biggest advantage you&#8217;d notice in the field with the 500mm PF is its light weight and quick auto-focus. It is an incredible lens for photographing birds in flight. However, the 200-500mm offers the flexibility of a zoom lens which absolutely should not be overlooked. I think any differences in sharpness is overshadowed by the other auxillary benefits these lenses provide so you can&#8217;t really go wrong with either of them in reality.</p>
<p>At this point in time, I&#8217;d also suggest looking at some of the Z-mount options on the market (if you own a mirrorless camera) such as the 400mm f/4.5 and the 600mm f/6.3 as I&#8217;ve heard great things about them. The 180-600mm could be a decent upgrade from your 200-500mm as well. </p>
<p>Hope this helps!<br />
-Adi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Nikon 500mm f/4e FL &#8211; A Long-term Review and Comparison with the 500mm PF by Tanumoy Das		</title>
		<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/nikon-500mm-fl-pf-review-and-comparison/#comment-32965</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanumoy Das]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 21:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.theluminarydiary.com/?p=19645#comment-32965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great review.

Is it worth upgrading from 200-500mm f5.6 to 500mm pf in terms of sharpness and quality? I know other factors are weather sealing, weight, more bokeh effect etc]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review.</p>
<p>Is it worth upgrading from 200-500mm f5.6 to 500mm pf in terms of sharpness and quality? I know other factors are weather sealing, weight, more bokeh effect etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Nikon 500mm f/4e FL &#8211; A Long-term Review and Comparison with the 500mm PF by UPAMANYU BASU		</title>
		<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/nikon-500mm-fl-pf-review-and-comparison/#comment-32962</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UPAMANYU BASU]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 06:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.theluminarydiary.com/?p=19645#comment-32962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very intersting points in comparison]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very intersting points in comparison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Nikon 500mm f/4E FL &#8211; First Impressions by Patrick Smith		</title>
		<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/nikon-500mm-f-4e-fl-first-impressions-compared-to-500mm-pf/#comment-32950</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 03:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theluminarydiary.com/?p=13767#comment-32950</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have had the 500FL for about 4.5 years now and it’s by far my favorite lens, I’ve ever owned or used. As newspaper photographer or photojournalist I’ve had access to just about every Nikon and Canon lens and camera over the years for work. We call it pool gear in the industry. Long story short, I’ve owned the 400mm f/2.8G and 400mm f/2.8E FL, the 800mm f/5.6E FL and many others. Anyways all of them were incredible lenses and always will be. However they were all large and heavy, and despite loving the 400mm f/2.8’s…I decided to risk it and sell my 400FL and 200-400mm f/4 VRII to get the Nikon 500mm f/4E FL. I had also never seen or used the 500FL, but unlike you, I was instantly shocked by how lightweight it was compared to my previous super-tele’s! 

You’re 100% correct the 500FL is extremely sharp and has excellent micro-contrast and overall contrast. It’s sharpness is off the charts even wide open, you only need to stop down for depth of field needs. It does take the TC-14E II and III extremely well. I especially like the version III myself. I’ve owned and used the 1.7x TC and 2x TC’s and wouldn’t recommend either. You’re better off using a crop sensor or cropping in post along with the TC-14E III. I personally use both the D6 and D500 along with the TC-14E III if need more reach. So you’re looking at 700mm f/5.6 and retain fast autofocus and excellent sharpness with the 1.4x TC’s! With the DX bodies or DX crop mode, obviously it’s 750mm equivalent focal length or field of view and 1050mm with both the 1.4x TC and DX crop! 

I highly, highly recommend this lens to anyone who shoots sports, wildlife it’s worth every penny. Plus they’re more affordable than ever used right now, even in excellent or mint condition. I’ve seen them for as low as $4800 USD used. For a mint copy, maybe $5,500 at most! It’s a much better build quality, quality control, better glass elements and better AF even when compared to say the new 800mm PF or other Z-mount primes, made in China. This lens like all professional grade super-tele Nikon’s are made in Japan by lifelong expert technicians/engineers! I’ve had a long relationship with Nikon and NPS from working for large newspapers and news/sports wire services. 

I’ve always used Nikon flagship bodies and pro-grade, made in Japan lenses for 27 years and I’ve only ever once needed a repair. Funny thing is that was a repair from an accidental drop and was covered by my insurance. So you can absolutely trust buying a used copy and I doubt you’d even be able to find a new copy. Nikon stopped making the FL super-tele primes and zooms about two years ago. So finding a new copy would be near impossible right now in 2024! For $4800-$5500 this is an incredible lens for the money! It’s lighter weight even when compared to the new Z-mount 600mm f/4 S and not far off from the new 400mm f/2.8 S, but unfortunately no built in TC here. I stilll borrow a 300mm f/2.8 VRII once in awhile from work, but I almost use the 500FL for my long shots! 

Otherwise I use the 70-200mm f/2.8E FL with 1.4x TC and or with 1.5x crop. I may someday add the 120-300mm f/2.8E FL or 180-400mm FL if I get a good price on a nice used copy. Anyways if you’re reading this and considering the 500pf, only get the latter if health or the weight is an issue for you. Im still relatively young and Im above average strength wise, so I handhold this 500FL almost exclusively! I only put it on my monopod or tripod if I’m injured and or sitting/standing in one spot for hours! If you’re strong and can hold 10lbs or so, you’ll be good and honestly this lens is so well balanced it feels like 7-8lbs!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had the 500FL for about 4.5 years now and it’s by far my favorite lens, I’ve ever owned or used. As newspaper photographer or photojournalist I’ve had access to just about every Nikon and Canon lens and camera over the years for work. We call it pool gear in the industry. Long story short, I’ve owned the 400mm f/2.8G and 400mm f/2.8E FL, the 800mm f/5.6E FL and many others. Anyways all of them were incredible lenses and always will be. However they were all large and heavy, and despite loving the 400mm f/2.8’s…I decided to risk it and sell my 400FL and 200-400mm f/4 VRII to get the Nikon 500mm f/4E FL. I had also never seen or used the 500FL, but unlike you, I was instantly shocked by how lightweight it was compared to my previous super-tele’s! </p>
<p>You’re 100% correct the 500FL is extremely sharp and has excellent micro-contrast and overall contrast. It’s sharpness is off the charts even wide open, you only need to stop down for depth of field needs. It does take the TC-14E II and III extremely well. I especially like the version III myself. I’ve owned and used the 1.7x TC and 2x TC’s and wouldn’t recommend either. You’re better off using a crop sensor or cropping in post along with the TC-14E III. I personally use both the D6 and D500 along with the TC-14E III if need more reach. So you’re looking at 700mm f/5.6 and retain fast autofocus and excellent sharpness with the 1.4x TC’s! With the DX bodies or DX crop mode, obviously it’s 750mm equivalent focal length or field of view and 1050mm with both the 1.4x TC and DX crop! </p>
<p>I highly, highly recommend this lens to anyone who shoots sports, wildlife it’s worth every penny. Plus they’re more affordable than ever used right now, even in excellent or mint condition. I’ve seen them for as low as $4800 USD used. For a mint copy, maybe $5,500 at most! It’s a much better build quality, quality control, better glass elements and better AF even when compared to say the new 800mm PF or other Z-mount primes, made in China. This lens like all professional grade super-tele Nikon’s are made in Japan by lifelong expert technicians/engineers! I’ve had a long relationship with Nikon and NPS from working for large newspapers and news/sports wire services. </p>
<p>I’ve always used Nikon flagship bodies and pro-grade, made in Japan lenses for 27 years and I’ve only ever once needed a repair. Funny thing is that was a repair from an accidental drop and was covered by my insurance. So you can absolutely trust buying a used copy and I doubt you’d even be able to find a new copy. Nikon stopped making the FL super-tele primes and zooms about two years ago. So finding a new copy would be near impossible right now in 2024! For $4800-$5500 this is an incredible lens for the money! It’s lighter weight even when compared to the new Z-mount 600mm f/4 S and not far off from the new 400mm f/2.8 S, but unfortunately no built in TC here. I stilll borrow a 300mm f/2.8 VRII once in awhile from work, but I almost use the 500FL for my long shots! </p>
<p>Otherwise I use the 70-200mm f/2.8E FL with 1.4x TC and or with 1.5x crop. I may someday add the 120-300mm f/2.8E FL or 180-400mm FL if I get a good price on a nice used copy. Anyways if you’re reading this and considering the 500pf, only get the latter if health or the weight is an issue for you. Im still relatively young and Im above average strength wise, so I handhold this 500FL almost exclusively! I only put it on my monopod or tripod if I’m injured and or sitting/standing in one spot for hours! If you’re strong and can hold 10lbs or so, you’ll be good and honestly this lens is so well balanced it feels like 7-8lbs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Topaz DeNoise AI vs. Neat Image &#8211; Battle of the giants by TommyK		</title>
		<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/denoise-ai-neat-image-comparison-review/#comment-32944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TommyK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 00:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theluminarydiary.com/?p=986#comment-32944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought the Topaz (free demo) over did it. The software limited me from making adjustments like you pointed out. I&#039;ve been using Neat Image V8 and it does a good job with overdoing it. Thanks for doing the comparison. I&#039;m validated to stick with Neat Image. Sometimes if Neat Images does not remove all the specs (if that is what you call them, similar look to a dead pixel), the blur tool in Photoshop solves the problem. Again, thanks for this post. Tommy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Topaz (free demo) over did it. The software limited me from making adjustments like you pointed out. I&#8217;ve been using Neat Image V8 and it does a good job with overdoing it. Thanks for doing the comparison. I&#8217;m validated to stick with Neat Image. Sometimes if Neat Images does not remove all the specs (if that is what you call them, similar look to a dead pixel), the blur tool in Photoshop solves the problem. Again, thanks for this post. Tommy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Review: Nikon 500mm f/5.6 PF – Autofocus and Teleconverter Performance by Jean-Paul Mutz		</title>
		<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/review-500pf-af-tc-performance-conclusion/#comment-32940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jean-Paul Mutz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2023 23:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theluminarydiary.com/?p=911#comment-32940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, try to combine 500 mm f/5.6 and TC 1.4, TC 1.7 and perhaps TC 2.0 and Nikon Z9, that will be a game changer ;-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, try to combine 500 mm f/5.6 and TC 1.4, TC 1.7 and perhaps TC 2.0 and Nikon Z9, that will be a game changer 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Review: Nikon 500mm f/5.6 PF – Autofocus and Teleconverter Performance by Michael		</title>
		<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/review-500pf-af-tc-performance-conclusion/#comment-32937</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2023 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theluminarydiary.com/?p=911#comment-32937</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Adi, great review of this lens-TC combination. I just picked up the AF-S 500 PF ED VR and noted the same issues with the autofocus on Tree Swallows in flight. The 500’s autofocus is faster without the teleconverter. I appreciate your review.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Adi, great review of this lens-TC combination. I just picked up the AF-S 500 PF ED VR and noted the same issues with the autofocus on Tree Swallows in flight. The 500’s autofocus is faster without the teleconverter. I appreciate your review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Review: Nikon 500mm f/5.6 PF – Autofocus and Teleconverter Performance by Aditya Sridhar		</title>
		<link>https://www.theluminarydiary.com/review-500pf-af-tc-performance-conclusion/#comment-32934</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aditya Sridhar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theluminarydiary.com/?p=911#comment-32934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.theluminarydiary.com/review-500pf-af-tc-performance-conclusion/#comment-32928&quot;&gt;Martyn Jones&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Martyn! Thanks for the kind comment! I just popped the 500mm PF and 1.4x TC on my D850, and 3D Tracking wasn&#039;t available on this combination either. At apertures of f/8 and smaller (which is the case when a TC is attached to the 500m PF), only the central cluster of AF points are available on the D850 (and, indeed, the D5 and D500). Hope that helps!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.theluminarydiary.com/review-500pf-af-tc-performance-conclusion/#comment-32928">Martyn Jones</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Martyn! Thanks for the kind comment! I just popped the 500mm PF and 1.4x TC on my D850, and 3D Tracking wasn&#8217;t available on this combination either. At apertures of f/8 and smaller (which is the case when a TC is attached to the 500m PF), only the central cluster of AF points are available on the D850 (and, indeed, the D5 and D500). Hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
